
#Plain text vs rich text software#
However, dynamic websites need continuing resources for software updates, maintenance, and security. This make them attractive for websites that require permissions-based access, e-commerce, or social interactions. Often, dynamic websites are managed by a content management system (CMS), like WordPress, Drupal, or Omeka. Dynamic websites store content in databases and use web servers to generate web pages upon each visit. Most of the websites we use every day are dynamic websites. Static vs Dynamic Websites Learning Objective: After examining this topic, participants will be able to describe the differences between static and dynamic websites. Newsom explains how static site generators work and discusses their advantages and disadvantages for team projects. Newson introduces static site generators for digital library projects with a case study involving a digitized maps collection. “ Tools and Workflows for Collaborating on Static Website Projects.” The Code4Lib Journal, no. For example, while static websites may be excellent options for digital exhibits and scholarly web publications, they are not suitable alternatives for repository systems or pre-print servers. It’s your responsibility to test the website and make improvements accordingly.ĭeciding to use a static website for a digital scholarship project requires a thorough understanding of the project’s use cases.
#Plain text vs rich text generator#
For example, one cannot assume that a popular open source theme for a static site generator meets your institutions digital accessibility policies. Using “as-is,” warranty-free open source software requires an added level of care over the quality of the code. This is not unique to static websites however, by taking on more control over the semantic markup and styles by editing and developing templates, you assume more responsibility over the usability and accessibility of the website. Administrative dashboards, analytics, submission management systems, and subscriber content would need to be handled using other services. Static websites are easiest to make when they are public and read-only. They do not support “logged in” user experiences. For scholarly publications and digital scholarship projects, frequent editing and updating may not be a primary concern, but projects involving many content editors with on-the-fly content updates may be better served by a publishing platform with a content management system. They are more difficult to edit after the work is complete. Static websites can be used with content management systems however, this usually requires additional configuration. Instead, they require direct interaction plain text files via a text editor and command line interface. In Rich Text, you can only type and can convert it into DOC and DOCX formats.Static websites are more difficult to learn because they don’t typically include a content management system. You can make the webpage more colorful by adding relevant tags and more images.They both have the ability to resize the text, format, font size and gives you the privilege to change them in the way you want.On the other hand, you can use HTML to create a separate image gallery for your website, depending upon your use. Rich Text won’t support you to add more images.Rich Text is used for embedding the images into a file, but HTML will allow you to make it as a hyperlink.But Rich Text won’t allow you to add these things. In HTML, you can include animated pictures, gifs.Main Differences Between HTML and Rich Text

These things can be linked dynamically so that they can be embedded in the text flow. It allows you to make entries and contents. It contains some text formatting options such as paragraphs, lists, and blockquotes. It gives you the complete privilege to change. You can limit the formatting options and tags in the way you want.

It allows the users to change it according to their use and style. They will be in normal English so people with English knowledge can easily understand. This can be easily read by normal humans. This text was first influenced by typesetting.Ī standard Rich Text contains only 7 ASCII characters. This was developed by Richard Brodie, David Luebbert, and Charles Simonyi. It is published by Microsoft Corporation. It can also be used to refer to multimedia documents such as images, audio, and video. Some of the layouts are fonts, underline, bold, and italics. The last and current version HTML 5 was released on October 28, 2014.
